Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate GVK plugin #378

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 25, 2015
Merged

Integrate GVK plugin #378

merged 13 commits into from
Nov 25, 2015

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Nov 21, 2015

This integrates the GVK plugin into JabRef.

Location of the original source code at http://jabref.tempelb.de/

Minor improvements:
 * replace calls to datafield.getAttribute("tag") by a single variable
@koppor koppor added this to the v3.0 milestone Nov 23, 2015
@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Nov 23, 2015

@JabRef/developers Please checkout this branch and run GVKParserTest locally. I updated from jdk1.8.0_51 to jdk1.8.0_66 and all tests fail here. The field ordering changed. The fields are not sorted as provided at https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/blob/gvk_fetcher/src/test/resources/net/sf/jabref/importer/fetcher/gvk_result_for_797485368.bib. Does this relate to JabRef#34 somehow?

@koppor koppor mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2015
4 tasks
 * adapt GVKParserTest accordingly
 * use Guava Strings.isNullOrEmpty in hasCiteKey and getFieldOrAlias
 * fix UTF-8 encoding in test cases
# Conflicts:
#	src/main/java/net/sf/jabref/model/entry/BibtexEntry.java
We use the German description instead of "GVK (Common Union Catalogue)" as GVK is typically used in Germany and (currently) the help file states the English translation.
@simonharrer
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me.

koppor added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2015
@koppor koppor merged commit 5f3ee69 into master Nov 25, 2015
@koppor koppor deleted the gvk_fetcher branch November 25, 2015 17:58
@hauschke
Copy link

hauschke commented Dec 2, 2015

GVK search doesn't work for me, using JabRef 3.0 on Windows 7. After starting a search I get no response. The progress bar goes on and on and on until I hit "cancel". Other searches (DOAJ, DBLP, IEEE) work. The used search terms work in GVK itself, too.

@matthiasgeiger
Copy link
Member

Works fine for me...

What are the search terms you have used?
Are there any messages in the error console (Help -> Show Error Console)?

@hauschke
Copy link

hauschke commented Dec 2, 2015

Search term examples: "marketing", "Papula,Lothar", "Papula, Lothar", "wlan", "mtbf"

Output of Error Console:

Exception in thread "JabRef CachedThreadPool" java.lang.NullPointerException: Every BibtexEntry must have a type.
at java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Unknown Source)
at net.sf.jabref.model.entry.BibtexEntry.setType(BibtexEntry.java:125)
at net.sf.jabref.model.entry.BibtexEntry.(BibtexEntry.java:76)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GVKParser.parseEntry(GVKParser.java:367)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GVKParser.parseEntries(GVKParser.java:63)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GVKParser.parseEntries(GVKParser.java:40)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GVKFetcher.fetchGVK(GVKFetcher.java:170)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GVKFetcher.processQuery(GVKFetcher.java:111)
at net.sf.jabref.importer.fetcher.GeneralFetcher$4.run(GeneralFetcher.java:288)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

@stefan-kolb stefan-kolb self-assigned this Dec 2, 2015
@stefan-kolb
Copy link
Member

Reproducible. Is caused by unknown entry types inside the fetcher.

@stefan-kolb stefan-kolb removed their assignment Dec 2, 2015
@stefan-kolb
Copy link
Member

Please continue discussion in #447.

@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Dec 2, 2015

@hauschke Workaround: Switch to BibLaTeX mode

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants